Je me souviens

This time last year I was in the South of France, and yesterday I happened to look over some of the printouts and notes given to me and my fellow Marchutz students. They are likely the most useful and thought-provoking pieces of paper I possess. One of them is a quote from Canto XXXIII of Dante’s Paradiso:

“Oh grace abounding, wherein I presumed to fix
my look on the eternal light so long that I
wearied my sight thereon!
Within its depths I saw ingathered, bound by love
in one volume, the scattered leaves of all
the universe;
substance and accidents and their relations, as
though together fused, after such fashion that
what I tell of is one simple flame”

We discussed this in class two times, the first of which was during the candle discussion.

Yesterday I also came across a youtube channel with videos about studying abroad at IAU in Aix.

Of all the videos I think this is the best one, and its about the Marchutz school’s professors.

La Fin du Semestre

Last Wednesday, IAU had its Talent Show. A British guy I’d invited over asked me if all Americans were this obnoxious. People played guitar, sang, read poetry, and performed Gangnam Style. There was free alcohol (provided by the school), which ensured the evening’s success. There was video taken of the show, which I hope does not find its way into the annals of the internet, otherwise I’ll have some weird questions to answer some day; “Daddy, why is there a video of you doing the horsey dance..?” I also tried playing the song Accidentally in Love on guitar (just because I learned it when I was 13) while accompanied by three girls who supposedly knew the words. I forgot some of the chords, so I had to improvise a little as my singers forgot the words (having the lyrics in front of us didn’t help too much).

On Saturday night Marchutz had its art exhibition. Each of the full Marchutz students had a selection of their work displayed, while others had 1-3 on the walls. Lots of snacks, free wine, and awards presented to 2 students who had done particularly good paintings. I was the only one not dressed up, as I was wearing a T-shirt. I guess I missed the memo…

Then Monday commenced the finals. I had my French oral exam, in which I spoke about food in France for 10 minutes. I handed in creative writing work, and then the next day was the French written final. DR MRS VANDERTRAMP <If you’ve ever had French class you’ll know what that means.

Then came the final, final exam, at the Marchutz studio. The professors had set it up so that around the room were masterworks done by various artists in various styles. On either side of each of these reproductions were two 21st century paintings, done by us. Each of the 8 of us had at least 2 paintings on the wall. The idea was to pick a set of artworks (we couldn’t choose our own) and write first about how the two 21st century paintings used drawing, color, value, volume, etc. to unify content and form or failed to do so. Second, we were to compare the 2 paintings to the earlier masterpiece in the middle. Someone with exceptional taste chose to write about mine. I still find it odd that my best painting leaves so much uncovered (you can even still see the pencil marks on it). The paintings I chose were two double portraits and the masterwork was a sculpture whose 2 figures are meant to signify the transfer of the old testament into the new, using the harvesting of the grain as a symbol for Christ. We took between 2.5-4 hours to finish our exam, depending on how fast you write. I have never been blessed with the power to answer test questions quickly. I had some sugar (with some coffee to go with it) which helped me pick up the pace. At the end, we drank some champagne, a poem was read, our paintings were carried out of the studio, and we took one last affectionate glance at the building before walking back.

And now I’m home.

Day IV

The four day non-stop seminar sans towels continued on Sunday. More cornflakes. More bread. Not enough oj for my liking, but I made do with water.

This time to Marmottan! When we got there we were given about 45 minutes to walk around and explore. Then we met all as one group to look at a painting (even though the professors were specifically told that this was not allowed).

Hoping not to  be caught, we sat in front of one of Monet’s Nymphéas (paintings of water lillies) and acted like detectives as we examined for 2 and a half hours. My professor has a sense of humor: “Eh, once you’ve seen one Nymphéa you’ve seen ’em all.”

I pointed out some things, other people pointed out some things. At the end of the day the painting is still blue and Monet still died in 1926. Then we left and were given 4 hours of free time. I decided to explore the cathedral across the street from Le Louvre by myself. I then went into the museum and explored, meeting some of the other students (and one of my professors staring deeply into the Rembrandt self-portrait from before). I ended up going the completely wrong direction on the way back, despite having a map in hand and remembering which way the sun sets. Nevertheless I returned on time, to get to the Metro, to the Gare de Lyon, where I fell asleep, then woke up and got on the bus, which took us to the bus station, from which I walked for a half hour home.

I had not yet seen the Rotonde lit up with so many Christmas lights, so I needed to stop and look around. But in the end they’re just primary colors: red, blue, white (American flag colors?!). Christmas lights don’t have that dazzling application of color contrasts that create distance, or that duality of light and dark that makes us feel like we’re in two places at once. Neither do they fulfill the goal of what Delacroix said: “That which does not pass, within that which passes, it exists.” Nor do they achieve the goal of Van Gogh: “I am working a great deal these days; by doing this I seek to find an expression for the desperately swift passing away of things in modern life.” In fact, they appear to me like the quintessence  of modern things that pass away…

My weekend hopefully unfulfilled, I walked home and ate some food. On to another week! Portrait painting awaited me…

Day III

Saturday approached. More corn flakes, bread, and stories of what other people did while I went looking for invisible Germans…

We returned to the Musée d’Orsay the next day and split into 2 groups for everybody’s favorite part: Portraits!

We began with Van Gogh’s Portrait of Doctor Gachet. We examined the way the blue undulating lines go against one another, how the red table does not continue in a straight line, the possible meanings of the foxgloves in his hand. We discussed whether the man appears sad, lonely, or depressed (attempting to sound smart, I added in the word “decrepitude” where “depression” probably would have sufficed).

Next we looked at Camille sur son Lit de Mort (Camille on her Deathbed). As always, reading the placard was pas permis, but of course some people did it anyway. I had forgotten that the name of Monet’s wife was in fact, Camille. She had died at age 29, and Monet had felt the need to paint her, though he felt disgusted with himself. We looked for the flowers that are on the bed, we talked about the way the sunlight looks as though it’s about to envelop her, and discussed whether she was still alive or recently dead. I liked drawing from this one, largely because of the way there are lines all over the place.

I had a short conversation with my professor during which I asked him what constitutes a masterpiece, and what is it about “academic art” that makes it fail the tests that artists like Van Gogh/Cézanne/Monet/Renoir/Delacroix try to live up to. He said he would show me before we left the museum. But it was time to move on; “Let’s go look at a masterpiece” he said. We walked up to a Cézanne; Portrait of Gustav Geffroy. We spent a lot of time looking from a distance, talking about the relationships between all the books and the figure, the distance between him and his fireplace, how the books look as though they’re going to fall off the table, etc. To illustrate how lines/perspective can change depending on how you look at it, we were told to look up at a bar that went across the ceiling and connected to the wall above an archway. Within this doorway (I’m not sure if that’s what you call it) there’s a bright green exit sign (like a regular “Exit” sign but smaller). Then through the passage is a large painting off in the distance. If you look at the exit sign, the bar appears to be going down. But then if you look down at the painting, the bar looks like it’s going up. You can easily find examples of this optical illusion in any city; just find a house or something and look at the eaves and how it appears to run towards things in the distance, and compare them.

As we were leaving my professor had me stop into a small room to show me why the new curators are morons. He pointed to a Cézanne paining to the left, which was of the bay on Marseille. “See that? Masterpiece…” Then he pointed to an enormous realistic looking painting of men herding bulls by the same location. “…crap.” “But, why…?” “Why did this guy paint the ocean this kind of blue? Because the ocean was like that. Why are the men’s shirts white? Because they’re white.” I suddenly remembered what Delacroix said…naturalism is a dead end in art…

I and a few others had Chinese  food for lunch. Again, overpriced, but tasty. Feeling particularly manly that day, I ate broccoli with it.

To begin the afternoon we met at La Musée de l’Orangerie. This was the least forgettable stop. The main attraction of this museum is two well-lighted oval-shaped rooms, each with 4 enormous Monet paintings. The rooms are separated in such a way that once you leave once room, the small passageway obscures your vision of the next room, so that you can’t look from one room into the other. The employees there keep telling us to shut up. “Un peu de silence s’il vous plait!!!” At first I preferred the first room. I looked into the water and I could view the sky, exactly as you can in the garden (no reflections of airplanes though). On a smaller side of the oval was a sunset painting, with the reds and yellows shining through the ripples of the water. The other side is nighttime, visible through thick willow trees. The other sides have more day-lit skies, and I was almost mesmerized by the cloud-filled sky on one of them. But after spending two hours in both rooms, primarily the second, I found the second had an even greater effect. By standing a few meters in front of the center of the far-most painting, it envelops your entire vision from left to right. One of the professors lay on his back and stared at this painting for at least an hour. We split up into groups of 4 or 5 and had 3 questions to work on: Why do you think Monet chose oval rooms rather than rectangles or squares? How does each room differ in character, and what determines this difference? What is the effect of these rooms together with respect to Monet’s overall conception? 

At the end of the day some of us (including the two teachers) went to have a drink at a café. Then it was dinner time (I didn’t want to turn down a free meal, even if it wasn’t spectacular). And of course I met more Germans (different ones, this time representing Heidelberg) whom I would actually end up meeting later, after dinner. They were doing their Praktikum, which essentially means they have to do office work for a couple weeks to fulfill some kind of requirement. It didn’t sound like they were so thrilled about it. There were 4 of them and only one spoke fluent English, which made things kind of fun. At one point we were in a Scottish bar. There was a 40-something year old guy already in there, violating the number one rule of men’s bathrooms, which is taking the middle urinals while the others are unoccupied. I politely pointed this out to him. I forget what he said, but I remember he said it in a British accent? I asked if he was Scottish. He replied no, that he was Welsh. I said I’d like to go there someday. He smilingly told me that if so, I must make absolutely sure to “Follow the Angles”. I asked him what he meant. “You’ll know when the time comes.”  He exited the bathroom toilet, and I was left there to contemplate his wisdom…

Paris Excursion: Day II

I awoke on Friday morning at 7:50am, energized and ready to take a shower and proceed eat a hearty breakfast consisting of bread, orange juice, a small pastry, and an endless supply of dry corn flakes. We had been forced to supply ourselves with towels, since the hotel didn’t have any.

The day began with another walk to the Louvre. The morning painting was Rembrant’s Bathsheba at her Bath. What is the relationship between the nude figure and the old woman washing her feet? Why is she wearing jewelry? What’s the meaning of that letter she’s holding?

We were instructed not to read the little information blurbs underneath the paintings, which would have been cheating.

We were interrupted by a woman who was giving a tour. She said that she had skipped the Rembrandt room and 30 minutes later we were still there, so the professors decided to give her the half hour she needed. It’s almost funny to me now that she expected us to move so soon. Most people just look at the painting for 5 seconds, spend much more time reading the little placard, take a picture, and move on. It’s especially painful to see if they use a camera with flash…

Anyway we came back and kept examining. At one point we were read the excerpt from the Bible (which I had not already known) in which King David orders Bathsheba’s husband into the most dangerous part of a battle so he would be killed, and ends with: “But what David had done displeased the LORD.” The somber look on her face suddenly became more understandable…

Then we took just a few moments to compare 2 of Rambrandt’s self portraits. The one on the right was done in his 30’s, the other in his 70’s. We were read a quote from Leo Marchutz (who founded the art school), in which Leo says that the entire surface of a painting must create its own light.

In the afternoon we migrated to the Musée d’Orsday. We were given 30 minutes to explore (as well as choose a painting about which to write later on), and then we reassembled near the entrance. Our professors expressed their outrage that apparently, since the last time they were there (which must have been on the last trip 1 year ago), the walls on the upper level had been painted black, thus dimming the light and creating a black bar at the top of every one of the paintings. Masterpieces were next to “crap”, and things were arranged by chronology even when this made no sense whatsoever. Nevertheless we split into two groups and got to work.

The first painting of the afternoon was one I liked so much I ended up buying a poster of it; Monet’s La Pie (The Magpie). One other student and I were convinced that the horizon was determined by a straightish line in the background, but everyone else thought that this was clouds. Try as I might, I could not find a way to think of the sky as covering the whole background, even if I looked at it upside-down (a common practice in the Marchutz tradition). We agreed to disagree. Someone else observed that he didn’t see the bird until after he had looked around the whole painting, and then figured that it was a human figure off in the distance. Somehow the darkest dark in the painting (by far) doesn’t immediately grab your attention.

Next we looked at a painting that I had actually chosen to copy 2 months beforehand while in the studio. As you might guess, it has lots of snow in it. It’s an Alfred Sisely painting called Neige à Louveciennes (Snow at Louveciennes). Someone mentioned not noticing the distant black figure right away. “Ring ring ring…does that ring any bells?”

Lastly we discussed Van Gogh’s L’Eglise d’Auvers (The Church of Auvers); how the contours are accentuated, the depth, the movement shown in the strokes in the foreground, etc.

At dinner I met some Germans (from Hamburg!) whom I talked to for a little while. They said to meet them on Rue de la Roquette. I said I didn’t know where that was, so they gave me an extra map they had and pointed it out. I went out looking for them and never found them, so instead found some Americans and Brazilians to talk to, as well as a French guy with whom I had a long political discussion. I was still hungry so I got some food from an Indian take-out place and made it back before 1am.

Rembrandt BathshebaLa Pie_Monetsisley-alfred-neige-a-louveciennes-1878Van Gogh_L'Eglise a Auvers  * Note that the first Rembrandt painting is large, while the others are comparatively small.

Taking our Time

YOPO: You only Paris once, or as in my case dear reader: twice, something of which you will presently be made acutely aware. Wednesday at 12:30h, the Marchutz students accompanied by the art history class (to make about 29 students total) got on the bus to get to the train, and before we knew it we were there. All in all, we only had one luggage casualty. We stayed in a hotel that the school uses every year, and they’re strict about 3 things in particular: no drinking alcohol in the rooms (ha!), no making noise after 10pm (again, ha!), and the doors lock at 1am. That last rule was a problem for a few people who had a little too much fun. During one of the nights I befriended some Germans who are apparently free from the alcohol rule, since unlike us, they actually know how to be quiet.

Wednesday night we went out and explored the city. There was a man playing guitar on one of the bridges that crosses the Seine (right near Notre Dame), and I enjoyed it so I gave him 10 cents. I separated myself from the group momentarily in order to sketch the water, but was soon interrupted by a guy who starting talking to me, telling me about his trips to the US, and how travel has gotten much more expensive since the 70’s.

The adventure truly began on Thursday, which we spent in the Louvre (The phrase “I’m in Louvre with you” got old pretty quickly). Our instruction was to “put on our blindfolds” and follow our professors to the first painting of the day, rapidly. Once we arrived we were given a measly 30 minutes to look around. So we walked around and looked at Renaissance paintings, including the Mona Lisa. Then we all gathered in front of Georgione’s Le Concert Champions (now attributed to Titian), from 1509, where we would remain for the next 2 and a half hours. As one of the art professors had told us in the pep-talk from the previous night: “We have time and we will take our time.” So we examined the painting, thinking about the form and how it brought some meaning to life. We didn’t even discuss every detail. Delacroix quotes were sprinkled throughout, since, well, my professor likes Delacroix. “Remember what Delacroix said…” was usually followed by a new quote, such as “naturalism is a dead end in art”. This is the one I remember, at any rate.

After our unreasonably-priced lunch (shrimp with noodles in my case) we split into two groups, each led by one of the professors, and we looked at 2 paintings. We used all the time we had until museum employees politely made us leave. My group started with a 4-walled room, and upon each wall was a painting by Poussin, each depicting a season and a biblical scene. The one we looked at was L’Automne, also called La Gorge de Raisin (Grape Gourge). So once again we spent hours looking and talking; about how the mountain is a symbol between Heaven and Earth, the use of perspective to draw the viewer’s eye toward the mountain, the characteristics of the 5 human figures, et cetera.

Last (and in my opinion, least) was The Countess del Carpio, Marquesa de la Solana, by Goya. Apparently this woman wanted a portrait done of her because she knew she was going to die soon. I didn’t write anything down about this painting, so I don’t really remember anything else about it. I can only imagine how uncomfortable it must have been to pose the way she is shown standing, seeing as I haven’t made high heels a fashion priority (and if you have to ask, no, men don’t wear high heels even in France. Sadly, I cannot say the same of Barcelona).

I went to bed early that day.

*Please note that the above pictures are pasted from the internet and thus do not really look like the real thing. As my art history professor once said: “Do you want to experience your first kiss out on the porch on a midsummer night after the prom? or do you want to read about it?” I didn’t take pictures of the paintings themselves because that would be rather silly…

La Culture

As always, the music industry continues onward to churn out 4 minute pop songs. I go to the gym, or walk by someone who’s playing the car radio trop fort, go to a bar….there is no escape! Of course as far as popular movies and TV and music go, there are differences between the French and the Americans as to which show/film/group enjoys more ubiquitous popularity, which is to be expected. For example most Americans don’t know (or at least I didn’t know) that Hugh Laurie has a jazz band, but it’s more well known in France. Call Me Maybe was even more popular here, believe it or not. The French adore James Bond; he’s truly the male ideal here (meanwhile, the same cannot be said for Russia).

But hidden between the branches and thickets is the Marchutz School of Art, where music accompanies us as we paint still lifes. Something I discovered is that I really like sacred music, especially Arvo Pärt, and occasionally some good ol’ Gregorian chant. The still lifes are now done. I painted many a plate of grapes, a vase of flowers, and a bowl of lemons. Alas! How time flies!

Today two men came to IAU to do a workshop with some of us. One is Israeli, and one is a Palestinian, and they met each other in Ireland, where they happened to be neighbors. We played various games designed to use the body to fuel creativity while working together. The Israeli (Idan) wrote a play called Bassam, based on the struggle that a Palestinian man went through after his 10 year old daughter was killed by an Israeli soldier in 2007. The Palestinian guy (Fadl) performed the one hour play by himself. It was well done. I asked both of them about playwriting, and they each gave me one useful tip: to use the body as an extension of the imagination (instead of just sitting in an attic or basement and writing/typing away), and second: make sure the actors can get into the role without any bias. Fadl mentioned after the play that an Irish actor was able to perform the role perfectly well, but it just wasn’t real enough, since he wasn’t Palestinian.

The whole thing ended with a positive note on the hope for peaceful resolution. Naturally some people likely left unconvinced given that the Israeli campaign is still ongoing…

 

L’automne

Remember that time I said people in France walk fast? Upon further review I have concluded that this is in fact not so…

Went to a new place for lunch today. It was Greek. I had a steak hache sandwich with some red peppers.

I have been working with Aquarelles (watercolors) for the past 5 classes, rather than oil paint. It makes things much easier (at least in my case).

It took a while, but the leaves finally fell off the trees. The trees on the Cours Mirabeau have been decorated with Holiday Christmas lights, so of course they are lit up at night. I’ll take some pictures eventually…The Cours Mirabeau is a big street in Aix which has all the banks on one side, and restaurants and shops on the other. It begins with the Rotonde (where the giant fountain can be found), and ends with the formidable statue of King René, the last ruler of Provence. Apparently “Good King René” did not have any heirs so the kingdom went to his nephew. A year later the nephew died so it went to King Louis XI.

Last Thursday my creative writing class was given a tour of Cathedral Saint Saveur (one of Aix’s notable historic sites). The cathedral has 3 parts, the first built near the end of the Roman empire (and using stones from the 1st century CE AD), the second during the Romanesque period (12th century), and the last in a Gothic style, built in the late 15th early 16th century.

Inside we examined the cloisters (in the first section), which were full of many symbols depicting Biblical stories and Christian history. Each column had a different image on each side, showing something I couldn’t have guessed merely by looking. Who would know for example, that the man pointing his finger in the direction of the larger part of the cathedral and rising out of the waves (they looked like clouds) was St. Matthew? And so on…There was a large old door that the priests used to use to walk into the cathedral from the outside secular world, and they’d be greeted by Matthew who would point them toward their destination. The water was supposed to symbolize rebirth, as with water used in baptism.

At the end our guide (one of the IAU professors) said that somewhere on the façade was a snail…so of course I had to find the snail. Which of course I did.

Oh non…de rien de rien…

After Giverny, I went to Paris, where winter had already begun. I got settled in my hostel (it was a nice hostel) and found a friend who’s studying there and we had dinner. We went to a restaurant that makes crêpes.

The next day, we explored the Rodin Museum, and I had the opportunity to see The Thinker first hand. I was also able to see The Gates of Hell, the plaster cast of which we saw in Coubertain. The amount of work that Rodin was able to do was impressive. I recall a certain Ancient Greek historian assuming that every accomplished man did his greatest work at the age of 40. Rodin meanwhile, did much of his work at age 31.

Later we went to a cooking class, in which I learned to make steak with red wine sauce, mashed potatoes with blue cheese, and for dessert we had something very French…I forget what it was. After that I did some exploring on my own, and then met up with people and talked for a while.

I heard a lot of American English, so I can only imagine what Paris must be like during the summer. As with New York, you can also hear a fair bit of German and Russian.

Later I met some nice Australians at my Hostel, and spent time talking to some French metalheads who listened to me speak French intently, while buying me beer.

Thursday I went to Saint Saveur and participated in mass for a bit. I kept a pamphlet on psalms and…well, something else in French. It’s in my to-read pile. I recalled learning about it in art history, and the kind of transition the ordinary person went through when entering such vast and beautiful building.

On Thursday night I made my voyage home, first riding the Metro all across town, then taking a train to Orly, thinking that’s where I needed to go (Orly Airport). Alas, I ended up in Orly the village, not Orly the airport! I wandered through some suburbs for a while before finding a guy around my age around 12:30am, who didn’t speak any English, who hepled me locate a taxi. So I finally got to the airport at 1am for my 6:55am flight….I read some books during the wait. One connect flight to Barcelona later, and I returned home to Aix, where it was once again warm and sunny! (bikini-weather as my art professor puts it)

And since then it’s been back to the old grind: class during the week: creative writing, French, art criticism/discussion, and lots and lots of painting. Also in my daily routine is going to the gym, and attending the occasional lecture. I’ve also gone to Bible Study for the past 2 times. I go primarily for the company, but sometimes a Bible passage here and there shines though and gives me something to consider.

And of course in addition to that is the 2-3  nights out a week at Rue de la Verrerrie (“Glass Street” or “Street of Glasses”) where most of the bars/clubs are.Five weeks remain! And by the way it is still warm and sunny in the middle of the day…

Giverny

While Hurricaine Sandy made her way through the Eastern United States this past week, I had my week off. The week began Friday morning with an 8:30h bus to the train station along with my fellow Marchutz students. Yes, yes, I did spend the beginning of my week off  on a school-related excursion. It was probably the best way to spend my time, as I would soon discover.

Overall we were in Giverny for four nights, and we stayed in two houses which were like our hotels. There were things in the kitchen to eat for breakfast, we would go to the museum restaurant for lunch (I ate rabbit on Sunday, and though I won’t say it tastes exactly like chicken, it’s very close). The restaurant brought us dinner each evening, and of course there was lots of champagne and red wine. I had the whole basement suite to myself, though I really only used it to sleep.

On Friday evening we were introduced to American sculptor Greg Wyatt, who asked each of us for “biographical information”. I heard someone refer to the way he spoke about different ways of making sculptures and the thought processes behind it as “Shakespearean”.  This guy is no joke. A comparison was later made between Greg and another sculptor who had recently visited (originally from the UK and now works in NY), given a talk to us in IAU, and then looked at some of the paintings on which we’d been working. This other guy (a college professor in the US) was asked about how he went about creating a particular sculpture. He mostly talked about how he wanted it to be in view of people below. When asked a similar question, Greg said he began by asking: “What element will the environment be? Earth, Water, Wind, or Fire?”

As he was talking I started to notice one of the members of our class who is in her 60’s, start taking notes furiously, as were my two art professors. I realized that I had brought my sketchbook and pencils so I started to do the same. Some things he said or mentioned were:

Art is an expression of curiosity and humility. The desire/ability to be an artist as a result of parenting or just basic will (i.e. nature vs. nurture). He gave the examples of Cézanne (whose parents were not artists), Michelangelo’s father (whose artistic inclinations were repressed), and recommended the first 50 pages of Mein Kampf, which apparently tells of the emotional pain suffered by a young Adolf who was not allowed to express himself through art. You have to form a knowledge base as well as an experience base. Keep a journal in which you write about art, preferably in French. Medievil perspective revolutionized the way in which artists represented perspective, whereas before, everything was side-by-side rather than overlapped. You should seek to create depth, even in yourself. The masters always kept extensive notes. The obvious is not so obvious. You need to strike a balance between discipline and the exuberance of making art. Befriend the materials. Always know what the goal is.

Here is something I hastily wrote down as he was speaking: “I thought there was a firewall [between being a practicing artist and being a professor], but this couldn’t be further from the truth…it’s all one. It’s how you apply creativity. When you read the journals of these masters, you find that they were always concerned with learning. They never stopped being students. They became better students.

On Saturday we spent the day “befriending” clay by molding it into various shapes and noting their respective mobility as we rolled them down our square boards. Afterward we wire to create a skeleton which we would later cover in plaster (think Plaster Fun Time, but before the paint goes on, and if you aren’t careful you can get your skin infected). I made (or attempted to make) a sculpture of my hand.

On Sunday morning we visited Monet’s garden. We walked around the pond looking for things to draw. My professors said that in all the times they’d been here, they’d never seen the sky look the way it did, and thus they’d never seen the pond reflect in such a way. As we all noted as soon as we had arrived in Giverny, the sky was much more purple than Aix, and naturally cloudier, but it was relatively sunny during our sejour in the garden. As with Arles, there were a great deal of Japanese tourists visiting, seeing as Monet was highly influenced by Japanese art (just like Van Gogh). We spent the afternoon introducing ourselves to copper wire. The goal was to take something we saw in the garden and use it as an idea to make a three-dimensional image using the wire. There is no obvious way to go about this. I ended up making Lilly pads. Then we coated our sculptures in wax.

On Monday we began working on our final project. This was another copper wire sculpture to be covered in wax. At 11h we toured Monet’s house. Most notable were all the Japanese artworks on the walls. There were also photographs of Monet and some of his relatives. In his studio were dozens of his paintings; impressions of landscapes, people, buildings, and (most vividly to me) an exotic-looking tree. At the end of the day we presented our sculptures to one another. My model was some thick tall grass (I don’t actually know what this is called), and its reflection.

On Tuesday we got on a bus and went to Coubertin to visit the foundry in which Greg had some of his work. We saw how the process works, how different employees have different jobs in turning a sculpture into something durable. We also explored the nearby area, which of course contained many sculptures. Then it was back on the bus, and we made our way to Paris where we made our separate ways…